Say no to customer feature requests without becoming a villain

What should you do when a customer keeps asking for the same feature? Here's how to share the decision and keep things constructive.

Jul 12, 2024

Jul 12, 2024

/

0 min read

What should you do when a customer keeps asking for the same feature? Or ask for something you know wonโ€™t happen?

What if they keep asking for the same feature?

Letโ€™s assume the answer (for today) is no.

  1. Say the decision for today

  2. Put the decision in context

  3. Share what it would take to revisit the decision

The trouble with open-ended answers

Try treating feedback like this as a request for a decision, instead of the feature itself. Actually figuring out how to build the feature comes later, if at all. But too often we leave customers in a vague limbo where they arenโ€™t sure if youโ€™re considering the feedback or acting on it. So they check.

You gotta say the decision. Call it a decision explicitly.

โ€œWeโ€™ve decided not to [do something]โ€ฆ and I can share our thinking for context.โ€

A decision gives closure, rather than leaving it open-ended โ€“ folks often use language like โ€œThatโ€™s good feedbackโ€, which is unclear if youโ€™re still considering and just need more pushing. Decisions release pressure, ambiguity builds it.

โ€œI donโ€™t think weโ€™ll do thatโ€ leaves options open and people wondering if you need more time. โ€œWe decided not to do thatโ€ brings closure. Some people will hear the first one as an invitation to persuade you. And why not? You seem unsure, and maybe could use some helpful perspective. Or maybe some time to think. Best to ask again next week.

If the decision is made, the conversation will change. โ€œWill you [do something]?โ€ โ†’ โ€œWill you change your decision?โ€ โ€“ the second is easier to navigate. They might believe it is the wrong choice, but for now thatโ€™s where youโ€™re at.

It's OK to change your mind later

You should be clear on which type of โ€œNoโ€ your decision is. If your answer is really โ€œNot yetโ€, what would it take for you to revisit the decision? Time? A specific event? Sharing this point of view can be useful to manage expectations. Especially if product feedback from sales is causing trouble with your product managers.

Most product priorities are two-way door decisions. They are reversible, and can change in the future under new circumstances.

Jeff Bezos explains one-way door decisions and two-way door decisions

What would cause you to change your mind? For example:

โ€œIf we started to hear this from multiple customers, that would cause us to revisit this decisionโ€ฆโ€

โ€œOnce mobile technology is further along, weโ€™re open to revisitingโ€ฆโ€

Put the decision in context

For feature requests with customers, it can help to remind them you have to consider a broader audience. If their request makes sense, itโ€™s OK to say so. Most customers are rational, and acknowledging their requestโ€™s validity can help you build credibility. It doesnโ€™t automatically commit you to the result.

What makes sense for one customer, may not make sense for the rest. A big part of credibility in these relationships comes from a belief that someone sees the same reality you do, and makes informed decisions based on goals instead of stubbornness. Spend time to prove it.

โ€œSounds like this makes a lot of sense for your team. We havenโ€™t heard anything like this from other customers yet, which is why Iโ€™m not able to give you the answer youโ€™re looking for today.โ€

You will find people who push anyway. Or maybe they start filing feature requests as bugs. โ€œItโ€™s broken because I expected this setting but I have no way to fix itโ€ฆโ€ โ€” and a topic for a different post.

But most of the time, doing these three things will help.

What should you do when a customer keeps asking for the same feature? Or ask for something you know wonโ€™t happen?

What if they keep asking for the same feature?

Letโ€™s assume the answer (for today) is no.

  1. Say the decision for today

  2. Put the decision in context

  3. Share what it would take to revisit the decision

The trouble with open-ended answers

Try treating feedback like this as a request for a decision, instead of the feature itself. Actually figuring out how to build the feature comes later, if at all. But too often we leave customers in a vague limbo where they arenโ€™t sure if youโ€™re considering the feedback or acting on it. So they check.

You gotta say the decision. Call it a decision explicitly.

โ€œWeโ€™ve decided not to [do something]โ€ฆ and I can share our thinking for context.โ€

A decision gives closure, rather than leaving it open-ended โ€“ folks often use language like โ€œThatโ€™s good feedbackโ€, which is unclear if youโ€™re still considering and just need more pushing. Decisions release pressure, ambiguity builds it.

โ€œI donโ€™t think weโ€™ll do thatโ€ leaves options open and people wondering if you need more time. โ€œWe decided not to do thatโ€ brings closure. Some people will hear the first one as an invitation to persuade you. And why not? You seem unsure, and maybe could use some helpful perspective. Or maybe some time to think. Best to ask again next week.

If the decision is made, the conversation will change. โ€œWill you [do something]?โ€ โ†’ โ€œWill you change your decision?โ€ โ€“ the second is easier to navigate. They might believe it is the wrong choice, but for now thatโ€™s where youโ€™re at.

It's OK to change your mind later

You should be clear on which type of โ€œNoโ€ your decision is. If your answer is really โ€œNot yetโ€, what would it take for you to revisit the decision? Time? A specific event? Sharing this point of view can be useful to manage expectations. Especially if product feedback from sales is causing trouble with your product managers.

Most product priorities are two-way door decisions. They are reversible, and can change in the future under new circumstances.

Jeff Bezos explains one-way door decisions and two-way door decisions

What would cause you to change your mind? For example:

โ€œIf we started to hear this from multiple customers, that would cause us to revisit this decisionโ€ฆโ€

โ€œOnce mobile technology is further along, weโ€™re open to revisitingโ€ฆโ€

Put the decision in context

For feature requests with customers, it can help to remind them you have to consider a broader audience. If their request makes sense, itโ€™s OK to say so. Most customers are rational, and acknowledging their requestโ€™s validity can help you build credibility. It doesnโ€™t automatically commit you to the result.

What makes sense for one customer, may not make sense for the rest. A big part of credibility in these relationships comes from a belief that someone sees the same reality you do, and makes informed decisions based on goals instead of stubbornness. Spend time to prove it.

โ€œSounds like this makes a lot of sense for your team. We havenโ€™t heard anything like this from other customers yet, which is why Iโ€™m not able to give you the answer youโ€™re looking for today.โ€

You will find people who push anyway. Or maybe they start filing feature requests as bugs. โ€œItโ€™s broken because I expected this setting but I have no way to fix itโ€ฆโ€ โ€” and a topic for a different post.

But most of the time, doing these three things will help.

What should you do when a customer keeps asking for the same feature? Or ask for something you know wonโ€™t happen?

What if they keep asking for the same feature?

Letโ€™s assume the answer (for today) is no.

  1. Say the decision for today

  2. Put the decision in context

  3. Share what it would take to revisit the decision

The trouble with open-ended answers

Try treating feedback like this as a request for a decision, instead of the feature itself. Actually figuring out how to build the feature comes later, if at all. But too often we leave customers in a vague limbo where they arenโ€™t sure if youโ€™re considering the feedback or acting on it. So they check.

You gotta say the decision. Call it a decision explicitly.

โ€œWeโ€™ve decided not to [do something]โ€ฆ and I can share our thinking for context.โ€

A decision gives closure, rather than leaving it open-ended โ€“ folks often use language like โ€œThatโ€™s good feedbackโ€, which is unclear if youโ€™re still considering and just need more pushing. Decisions release pressure, ambiguity builds it.

โ€œI donโ€™t think weโ€™ll do thatโ€ leaves options open and people wondering if you need more time. โ€œWe decided not to do thatโ€ brings closure. Some people will hear the first one as an invitation to persuade you. And why not? You seem unsure, and maybe could use some helpful perspective. Or maybe some time to think. Best to ask again next week.

If the decision is made, the conversation will change. โ€œWill you [do something]?โ€ โ†’ โ€œWill you change your decision?โ€ โ€“ the second is easier to navigate. They might believe it is the wrong choice, but for now thatโ€™s where youโ€™re at.

It's OK to change your mind later

You should be clear on which type of โ€œNoโ€ your decision is. If your answer is really โ€œNot yetโ€, what would it take for you to revisit the decision? Time? A specific event? Sharing this point of view can be useful to manage expectations. Especially if product feedback from sales is causing trouble with your product managers.

Most product priorities are two-way door decisions. They are reversible, and can change in the future under new circumstances.

Jeff Bezos explains one-way door decisions and two-way door decisions

What would cause you to change your mind? For example:

โ€œIf we started to hear this from multiple customers, that would cause us to revisit this decisionโ€ฆโ€

โ€œOnce mobile technology is further along, weโ€™re open to revisitingโ€ฆโ€

Put the decision in context

For feature requests with customers, it can help to remind them you have to consider a broader audience. If their request makes sense, itโ€™s OK to say so. Most customers are rational, and acknowledging their requestโ€™s validity can help you build credibility. It doesnโ€™t automatically commit you to the result.

What makes sense for one customer, may not make sense for the rest. A big part of credibility in these relationships comes from a belief that someone sees the same reality you do, and makes informed decisions based on goals instead of stubbornness. Spend time to prove it.

โ€œSounds like this makes a lot of sense for your team. We havenโ€™t heard anything like this from other customers yet, which is why Iโ€™m not able to give you the answer youโ€™re looking for today.โ€

You will find people who push anyway. Or maybe they start filing feature requests as bugs. โ€œItโ€™s broken because I expected this setting but I have no way to fix itโ€ฆโ€ โ€” and a topic for a different post.

But most of the time, doing these three things will help.

Need to tell a better product story?

Learn how Rally makes great storytelling easy for your whole team, sales to customer.